Calculate Embedded Emissions for Unwrought Aluminium (HS7601)

Enter your input

Payable emissions (tCO₂e/t)

Total CBAM Cost (€)

Notes:
There may be a difference when calculating the price with respect to import volume, carbon price, and benchmark emissions, as the embedded formula may result in minor variations due to decimal rounding. Therefore, the actual value may vary.

CBAM is applicable to trade volumes starting from 50 metric tonnes. For trade volumes below 50 metric tonnes, CBAM does not apply.

Usage Procedure – How to use the CBAM Calculator Sheet

Enter or update values only in the INPUT
PARAMETERS section (Highlighted in blue) , including
the carbon price, benchmark emissions, CBAM
chargeable percentage (as per the phase-in year),
and imported quantity.

The system will automatically calculate the payable
emissions and the total CBAM cost (€) based on the
inputs provided.

Notes:
• Change any input value to automatically update CBAM cost.
• Formula used: Carbon price × payable emissions × quantity.
• Model aligned with CBAM supplier-side illustrative methodology.

15 FEBRUARY 2019 AL CIRCLE

Baphlimali Bauxite Mine faces show cause notice from SPCB on environmental non-compliance

EDITED BY : DEBANJALI SENGUPTA 2MINS READ

According to a recent report, a show cause notice has been served to the Utkal Alumina’s Baphlimali Bauxite Mine for cancellation of mining lease for allegedly failing to comply with environmental norms.

{alcircleadd}

As per the report, the State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) has served a show cause notice on the bauxite mining asking for a reply from its director with 15 days as to why the consent granted for mining should not be revoked. Sources said Utkal Alumina International Limited is operating the mine at Paikkupakhal in Rayagada district over a leasehold area of 1,388.74 hectare.

SPCB officials detected discrepancies in environmental compliances when they had gone for inspecting the mine on January 16 and January 17.

The notice was served to the mine on February 12, stating that fugitive dust emission was found from the crushing plant and heavy fugitive emission from haulage road due to plying of vehicles.

SPCB claimed that the PM10 (particulate matter 10 micrometer or less in diameter) concentration was higher than the prescribed norm at all the locations including the roof of administration building and near crusher during monitoring of ambient air quality. SPCB also claimed that the mining unit could not complete the installation of three Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations with data transfer facility, which was supposed to be done by September last year.

The inspection also found the absence of collection system of runoff water at certain places of the mine, due to which the agricultural fields and water quality of streams at the foothill were possibly affected.

Tagged with: