Adv
LANGUAGES
English
Hindi
Spanish
French
German
Chinese_Simplified
Chinese_Traditional
Japanese
Russian
Arabic
Portuguese
Bengali
Italian
Dutch
Greek
Korean
Turkish
Vietnamese
Hebrew
Polish
Ukrainian
Indonesian
Thai
Swedish
Romanian
Hungarian
Czech
Finnish
Danish
Filipino
Malay
Swahili
Tamil
Telugu
Gujarati
Marathi
Kannada
Malayalam
Punjabi
Urdu
AL CIRCLE

Supreme Court directs Nalco to supply 30,000 tonnes of alumina to Vedanta's Visakhapatnam unit

EDITED BY : 2MINS READ

On Wednesday, August 19, the Supreme Court ordered National Aluminium Company (NALCO) to ensure delivery of 30,000 tonnes of metallurgical-grade calcined alumina to Vedanta at Visakhapatnam on Free on Board (FOB) basis. The same will be for use in Vedanta’s SEZ unit at Jharsuguda in Orissa, mandated the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court directs Nalco to deliver 30,000 tonnes of alumina to Vedanta at Vishakhapatnam

{alcircleadd}

Vedanta Resources had filed a contempt petition to the Supreme Court against Nalco, alleging “willful disobedience” of January order that allowed the UK-based arm to participate in the state-run aluminium producer’s tender for the sale of surplus 30,000 tonnes of metallurgical-grade calcined alumina.

Vedanta had emerged as a successful bidder for Nalco’s alumina tenders meant for exports. But the latter refused to allow the UK firm to take the consignment to its SEZ unit and insisted on terminating the transaction at Visakhapatnam port.

On Wednesday, a bench led by Chief Justice SA Bobde said both Nalco and Vedanta had agreed to abide by its January order. “Nalco has no difficulty in delivering the consignment at Visakhapatnam port on FOB basis, though the same is meant to be used by Vedanta SEZ unit at Jharsuguda,” the order stated, while noting the Vedanta’s statement that it will accept the goods at Visakhapatnam port.

However, senior counsel Mukul Rohtagi, who appeared for Vedanta, wanted the Supreme Court to keep the contempt petition pending, stating that he had serious doubt if Nalco was abiding by the apex court order.

Global Aluminium Industry - Key Trends to 2030

He argued that Nalco made repeated attempts to sidestep the SC order, firstly by refusing to raise invoice in Vedanta’s SEZ office. “Nalco officials are purposely and wilfully trying to circumvent the SC’s directions,” stated Rohtagi.

Nalco executive director R N Mohapatra was also present at the Supreme Court virtual hearing as he was issued a notice in early August.

Adv
Adv
Adv
Adv
Adv
Adv
Adv
EDITED BY : 2MINS READ

Responses

Adv
Adv
Adv
Loading...
Adv
Adv
Adv
Loading...
Reports VIEW ALL
Loading...
Loading...
Business Leads VIEW ON AL BIZ
Loading...
Adv
Adv
Would you like to be
featured with us?
Loading...

AL Circle News App
AL Biz App

A proud
ASI member
© 2025 AL Circle. All rights reserved. AL Circle is not responsible for content from external sources.