Rio Tinto, one of the world’s largest mining and metals companies, sets out to strategise its approach to aluminium sales in the United States. The reason behind their new strategy is the imposition of a 50 per cent tariff on Canadian aluminium imports earlier this summer. Traditionally, Canada is the major supplier of aluminium to US industries, thus making new tariffs absolutely disruptive.
What Rio Tinto is doing to offset the huge expense
While the newly imposed tariff has pushed up the expenses significantly, Rio Tinto’s strategy is to scale back aluminium shipments from Canada. Instead of heavily relying on stockpiles, the company is shifting its focus to the existing inventories. As a result, they can easily continue to honour supply agreements with major industrial customers without immediately passing on the additional tariff burden.
This shift in strategy shields clients from sudden cost spikes but, at the same time, helps maintain stability in the manufacturing process so that there’s a steady flow of aluminium supply. It’s certainly a broader balancing act, say industrial analysts. To maintain its long-term relationship with the wider US customer base, Rio’s initiative was a business imperative. However, at the same time, they had to ensure that the policy change did not disrupt the supply chain.
Leveraging the buffer resource, however, is not a permanent solution. Domestic inventories, though useful in the short term, are not infinite. Once those reserves diminish, the dependence on the costlier imports will surely increase, which will eventually drive the price higher.
Also read: Vedanta announces $10B Capex plan, targets aluminium as growth engine
Ripple effects on pricing and supply
In spite of the high tariff and limited availability of aluminium in the US market, the demand is still quite strong. Manufacturers still heavily rely on metal, especially in the aerospace, automotive, and packaging industries. They are dealing with the risks of high input costs and thinner margins.
At this point, most of the investors are keeping their eyes fixated on the aluminium producers to identify how they can benefit from firmer prices and major users of the metal. After all, investors also need to safeguard their profitability in the face of mounting cost pressures.
Final takeaway with wider implications
The situation itself points to the structural weaknesses in the US aluminium supply chain. Tariffs should be primarily intended to encourage domestic production, but the sudden increase in tariffs in this case led to limited production because, in most cases, the producers feared cost pressures across industries. This raises broader questions about whether protectionist trade measures strengthen US manufacturing resilience or simply make it more expensive.
Responses
